{"id":90,"date":"2011-03-10T09:57:53","date_gmt":"2011-03-10T09:57:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/?p=90"},"modified":"2016-11-11T14:12:21","modified_gmt":"2016-11-11T14:12:21","slug":"maria-moog-gruenewald-ed-brills-new-pauly-supplements-4-the-reception-of-myth-and-mythology-leiden-boston-brill-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/06-1\/reviews61\/maria-moog-gruenewald-ed-brills-new-pauly-supplements-4-the-reception-of-myth-and-mythology-leiden-boston-brill-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Maria Moog-Gr\u00fcnewald (ed.), Brill\u2018s New Pauly. Supplements 4. The Reception of Myth and Mythology (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2010)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\t
\n\n\t\t<\/i><\/span> <\/a>\n\n\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n

This encyclopaedia served literally as a pivotal reference work for several generations of students and academics, especially though not exclusively in Continental Europe. However, being as massive as it was impressive, this important source of knowledge was never translated into English in toto<\/em>. On the contrary, such a fate awaited the newer and thoroughly revised version of the same encyclopaedia, i.e. Der Neue Pauly<\/em>, published by J.B. Metzler over the period 1996-2003. While the translation of Der Neue Pauly<\/em> is reaching its completion with the publication of the supplementary volumes, Brill\u2019s already twenty-six-volume New Pauly<\/em> has become one of the richest encyclopaedias of Western antiquity in today\u2019s Anglophone world, and possibly the most consulted reference work in its field. What is more, the New Pauly<\/em> provides not only an extensive coverage of the cultures and events in the ancient heart of Europe from early Aegean times to late antiquity, but also a multi-disciplinary study of the reception of classical antiquity in the following centuries\u2014indeed up to the present day. Particular attention has been paid in the New Pauly<\/em>\u00a0to the changes and trends in classical scholarship itself, which has witnessed as diverse and turbulent an existence as the Graeco-Roman civilisations themselves.<\/p>\n

The supplementary volume reviewed hereby belongs to the latter, multi-disciplinary study area. As the subtitle highlights, it is devoted to the reception of classical myth and mythology. Its original version was published in German in 2008: a two-year backlog for translation in today\u2019s lingua franca<\/em> of scholarship is not blameworthy. The volume reads as a one-book lexicon of the most important characters in ancient mythology. Each lemma tackles one (e.g. Achilles, 1-14; Zeus, 616-20) or, in alternative, famous pairs (e.g. Agamennon and Clytaemnestra, 37-42) and groups (e.g. Nymphs, 433-43). Information is offered concisely and in a fairly standardised manner: Greek and Latin names come first; then a brief summary of the character\u2019s\/s\u2019 main features; a presentation of the relevant myth(s) involving it\/them, inclusive of historical and geographical variants; the character\u2019s\/s\u2019 relevance in ancient religion(s); and eventually its\/their literary and artistic reception in ancient, medieval, modern, and contemporary times, inclusive of references to significant philosophical, artistic and political usages and conceptualisations.<\/p>\n

A complete overview of all the known receptions of each character would have been impossible or, at least, impractical. However, the lexicon of this Supplement<\/em> is generous enough with representative varieties of interpretations concerning each mythical character concerned. As such, this volume serves also as a concise history of Western ideas, which means that\u00a0the fourth Supplement<\/em>\u00a0of the New Pauly<\/em> should appeal not solely to classical scholars and historians, but also to students and academics in the humanities at large. In particular, art historians and cultural theorists may find this volume a very useful reference book; one of those books that should be kept on top of one’s office desk. Still, a more extensive overview would have been possible and, in all probability, even more practical to the academic community. The editorial choice of favouring \u201cthe need for brevity and lexical usability\u201d (viii) over the comprehensiveness of the lexicon may be well-intended, yet at the same time it does strike as na\u00efve, especially if one considers the encyclopaedic nature of the whole enterprise to which it belongs. Besides, given the considerable amount of money that university libraries, research centres and individual scholars are expected to disburse for each volume, including the Supplement<\/em> at issue, not to mention for purchasing or accessing the whole\u00a0New Pauly<\/em> online, then it would have been wiser to make the lexicon \u201cfatter\u201d rather than \u201cslender\u201d.<\/p>\n

Pecuniary considerations aside, the scholarly fitness of the fourth Supplement<\/em> remains excellent. It is highly recommended to all humanists and scientists that may need or benefit from expert accounts of ancient myths and their reception in Western culture.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pauly’s Realencyclop\u00e4die der classischen Altertumswissenschaft<\/em> is an internationally renowned multi-volume encyclopaedia of classical history and classical culture developed in the decades between 1839 and 1980 by a long string of accomplished scholars and researchers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":254,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[262,263,112,264,265],"coauthors":[990],"class_list":["post-90","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reviews61","tag-antiquity","tag-classicals","tag-greece","tag-mythology","tag-rome"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1567,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90\/revisions\/1567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nome.unak.is\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=90"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}